On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef was modifying the domain XML.
It tried to find a seclabel corresponding to given sec driver. If the
label wasn't found, the function created one which is wrong. In fact
it's security manager
On 28.03.2013 10:15, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef was modifying the domain XML.
It tried to find a seclabel corresponding to given sec driver. If the
label wasn't found, the function created one
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:42:39AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
On 28.03.2013 10:15, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 04:35:10PM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote:
The virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef was modifying the domain XML.
It tried to find a seclabel corresponding to
The virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef was modifying the domain XML.
It tried to find a seclabel corresponding to given sec driver. If the
label wasn't found, the function created one which is wrong. In fact
it's security manager which should modify this part of domain XML.
---