Il 03/08/2012 07:16, Doug Goldstein ha scritto:
You are proposing /domain/pm; but we also have /domain/os/bios, would
this be better as a subelement /domain/os/bios/pm, since it is related
to bios options?
I would say that /domain/os/bios/pm isn't the correct place because
/domain/os
On 08/03/2012 07:16 AM, Doug Goldstein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/02/2012 06:05 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
There is a new pm/ element implemented that can control what ACPI
sleeping states will be advertised by BIOS and allowed to be
On 08/03/2012 09:46 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 03/08/2012 07:16, Doug Goldstein ha scritto:
You are proposing /domain/pm; but we also have /domain/os/bios, would
this be better as a subelement /domain/os/bios/pm, since it is related
to bios options?
I would say that /domain/os/bios/pm isn't
There is a new pm/ element implemented that can control what ACPI
sleeping states will be advertised by BIOS and allowed to be switched
to by libvirt. The default keeps defaults on hypervisor, otherwise
forces chosen setting.
---
docs/schemas/domaincommon.rng | 33 ++
On 08/02/2012 06:05 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
There is a new pm/ element implemented that can control what ACPI
sleeping states will be advertised by BIOS and allowed to be switched
to by libvirt. The default keeps defaults on hypervisor, otherwise
forces chosen setting.
You are proposing
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/02/2012 06:05 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote:
There is a new pm/ element implemented that can control what ACPI
sleeping states will be advertised by BIOS and allowed to be switched
to by libvirt. The default keeps defaults
