Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv3] security: Don't ignore errors when parsing DAC security labels

2012-09-20 Thread Martin Kletzander
On 09/19/2012 02:42 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: The DAC security driver silently ignored errors when parsing the DAC label and used default values instead. With a domain containing the following label definition: seclabel type='static' model='dac' relabel='yes' labelsdfklsdjlfjklsdjkl/label

Re: [libvirt] [PATCHv3] security: Don't ignore errors when parsing DAC security labels

2012-09-20 Thread Peter Krempa
On 09/20/12 16:04, Martin Kletzander wrote: On 09/19/2012 02:42 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: The DAC security driver silently ignored errors when parsing the DAC label and used default values instead. With a domain containing the following label definition: seclabel type='static' model='dac'

[libvirt] [PATCHv3] security: Don't ignore errors when parsing DAC security labels

2012-09-19 Thread Peter Krempa
The DAC security driver silently ignored errors when parsing the DAC label and used default values instead. With a domain containing the following label definition: seclabel type='static' model='dac' relabel='yes' labelsdfklsdjlfjklsdjkl/label /seclabel the domain would start normaly but the