On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 12:01:03PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 08/06/2018 10:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>
> >>
> >> So do we really need virtlockd for this? I mean, the whole purpose of it
> >> is to hold locks so that libvirtd can restart independently, without
> >> losing the lock
On 08/06/2018 10:30 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
>>
>> So do we really need virtlockd for this? I mean, the whole purpose of it
>> is to hold locks so that libvirtd can restart independently, without
>> losing the lock attached. However, since the metadata lock will be held
>> only for a
On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 10:02:44AM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
> >> made
On 07/27/2018 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
>> made several attempts to fix it. However, none of them made into the
>> tree. I
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 01:27:40PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> On 07/27/2018 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
> >> made
On 07/27/2018 11:01 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
>> made several attempts to fix it. However, none of them made into the
>> tree. I
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:56:23AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
> made several attempts to fix it. However, none of them made into the
> tree. I guess it's time to have discussion what to do about it.
Dear list,
we have this very old bug [1] that I just keep pushing in front of me. I
made several attempts to fix it. However, none of them made into the
tree. I guess it's time to have discussion what to do about it. IIRC,
the algorithm that I implemented last was to keep original label in
XATTRs
