On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 17:26:51 +0100
Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:33:14AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:19:42 +0100
> > Erik Skultety wrote:
> >
> > > Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 05:48:23PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:44:37PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:19:42PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > > Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> > > interract with
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:44:37PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:19:42PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> > interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the
> > non-managed
>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 09:33:14AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:19:42 +0100
> Erik Skultety wrote:
>
> > Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> > interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 16:44:37 +
"Daniel P. Berrange" wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:19:42PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> > Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> > interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:19:42PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the non-managed
> devices, i.e. those pre-created by the user, since that will be revisited once
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 13:19:42 +0100
Erik Skultety wrote:
> Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the non-managed
> devices, i.e. those pre-created by the user, since that will
On 06.02.2017 13:19, Erik Skultety wrote:
> Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
> interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the non-managed
> devices, i.e. those pre-created by the user, since that will be revisited once
> we all settled on
Finally. It's here. This is the initial suggestion on how libvirt might
interract with the mdev framework, currently only focussing on the non-managed
devices, i.e. those pre-created by the user, since that will be revisited once
we all settled on how the XML should look like, given we might not