Re: [libvirt] CPU topology 'sockets' handling guest vs host

2012-06-07 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On my x86_64 host I have a pair of Quad core CPUs, each in a separate NUMA node. The virsh capabilities topology data reports this:  # virsh capabilities | xmllint  --xpath /capabilities/host/cpu -  cpu      

[libvirt] CPU topology 'sockets' handling guest vs host

2012-03-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On my x86_64 host I have a pair of Quad core CPUs, each in a separate NUMA node. The virsh capabilities topology data reports this: # virsh capabilities | xmllint --xpath /capabilities/host/cpu - cpu archx86_64/arch modelOpteron_G3/model vendorAMD/vendor topology

Re: [libvirt] CPU topology 'sockets' handling guest vs host

2012-03-26 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:42:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On my x86_64 host I have a pair of Quad core CPUs, each in a separate NUMA node. The virsh capabilities topology data reports this: # virsh capabilities | xmllint --xpath /capabilities/host/cpu - cpu

Re: [libvirt] CPU topology 'sockets' handling guest vs host

2012-03-26 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:08:05PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:42:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On my x86_64 host I have a pair of Quad core CPUs, each in a separate NUMA node. The virsh capabilities topology data reports this: # virsh capabilities |

Re: [libvirt] CPU topology 'sockets' handling guest vs host

2012-03-26 Thread Jiri Denemark
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 16:11:08 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 05:08:05PM +0200, Jiri Denemark wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 15:42:58 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: So, the XML checker is mistaking 'sockets' as the total number of sockets, rather than the