Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a little funny with running guests and the
Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 04/27/2010 04:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a
On 04/28/2010 11:43 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 04/27/2010 04:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line
Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 04/28/2010 11:43 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Chris Lalancette wrote:
On 04/27/2010 04:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a little funny with running guests and the restoration
* of snapshots. If the snapshot was taken online,
* then after a loadvm monitor command, the
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a little funny with running guests and the restoration
* of snapshots. If the snapshot was
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a little funny with running guests and the restoration
* of
On 04/27/2010 04:40 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 06:45:16PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
I ran clang on the very latest and it spotted this problem:
From qemu_driver.c, around line 11100,
else {
/* qemu is a little funny with running
