here is no F8 build in
bodhi.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7768
Please release a 0.4.6 F8 update for the benefit of us using F8 dom0. I'm stuck
on non-HVM hardware for the foreseeable future, so KVM isn't an option for me.
And F9 isn't an option for me sin
- "Daniel Veillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 09:17:43AM -0700, Dale Bewley wrote:
> > I see that 0.4.5 for F9 just made it through bodhi, but there is no
> F8 build in bodhi.
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2
at work!
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats/Virtualization
[2] http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-10/f-10-docs-tasks.html
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DaleBewley#Virtualization_Release_Notes
--
Dale Bewley - Unix Administrator - Shields Library - UC Davis
GPG: 0xB098A0F3
Docs/Beats/Virtualization
--
Dale Bewley - Unix Administrator - Shields Library - UC Davis
GPG: 0xB098A0F3 0D5A 9AEB 43F4 F84C 7EFD 1753 064D 2583 B098 A0F3
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 09:44 -0700, Scott Beardsley wrote:
> Is there any authorization mechanism in libvirt? I've got TLS going so
> that only those with a cert signed by my CA are allowed in, but there
> appears to be no way for me to only allow them access to certain VMs.
> Can I limit folks to s
I've been busy at my day job and not paying close enough attention to
Fedora 11 docs deadlines. Apparently the window for changes essentially
closes Wednesday (today).[1]
The notes are essentially in place. I don't think there are any gaping
holes, but I should have prompted for feedback much soon
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 19:32 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>libvirt TCK : Technology Compatibility Kit
Amazing :)
> Even these 4 simple proof of concept scripts have highlighted
> some horrible problems
>
> - The QEMU driver 'define domain' method doesn't check for name
>or UUID uniq
