On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:28:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Historically we have relied on autopoint/gettextize to install a
> > standard po/Makefile.in.in. There is very limited scope for customizing
> > this and it a
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:28:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Historically we have relied on autopoint/gettextize to install a
standard po/Makefile.in.in. There is very limited scope for customizing
this and it also causes a bunch of extra stuff to be pulled into
configure.ac which potentia
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 02:28:18PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
Historically we have relied on autopoint/gettextize to install a
standard po/Makefile.in.in. There is very limited scope for customizing
this and it also causes a bunch of extra stuff to be pulled into
configure.ac which potentia
Historically we have relied on autopoint/gettextize to install a
standard po/Makefile.in.in. There is very limited scope for customizing
this and it also causes a bunch of extra stuff to be pulled into
configure.ac which potentially clashes with gnulib. Writing make rules
for po file management is