Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-14 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:59:11 +0100 Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 20:24:44 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:41:38 + > > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Peter Krempa
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 20:24:44 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:41:38 + > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 19:20:58 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:41:38 + Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 19:20:58 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:35:19 +0100 > > > Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12,

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 07:28:45PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 19:20:58 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:35:19 +0100 > > Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:58 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > > On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Peter Krempa
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 19:20:58 +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:35:19 +0100 > Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:58 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Igor Mammedov
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:35:19 +0100 Peter Krempa wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:58 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > > This capability tracks whether

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 1/12/21 12:35 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:58 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: This capability tracks whether memory-backend-file has

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Peter Krempa
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:29:58 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > This capability tracks whether memory-backend-file has > > > "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" attribute.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Michal Privoznik
On 1/12/21 12:19 PM, Peter Krempa wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: This capability tracks whether memory-backend-file has "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" attribute. Introduced into QEMU by commit v4.0.0-rc0~189^2. While "x-" prefix is considered

Re: [PATCH 1/2] qemu_capabilities: Introduce QEMU_CAPS_X_USE_CANONICAL_PATH_FOR_RAMBLOCK_ID

2021-01-12 Thread Peter Krempa
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:29:49 +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > This capability tracks whether memory-backend-file has > "x-use-canonical-path-for-ramblock-id" attribute. Introduced into > QEMU by commit v4.0.0-rc0~189^2. While "x-" prefix is considered Please use a commit hash instead of this.