Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 00/15] Misc build refactoring / isolation work

2018-02-02 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 07:51:16PM +0100, Peter Krempa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 16:21:22 +, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> > This was triggered by the recent Fedora change to add '-z defs' to RPM
> > builds by default which breaks libvirt. Various make rule changes can
> > fix much of the problem, but it also requires source refactoring to get
> > rid of places where virt drivers directly call into the storage/network
> > drivers. Co-incidentally this work will also be useful in allowing us to
> > separate out drivers to distinct daemons.
> > 
> > In v2:
> > 
> >  - Fixed header file name comment
> >  - Resolve conflicts
> 
> Could you please upload the rebased version of this to some remote
> repository as it has again non-trivial conflicts?

Yeah, it conflicts with my own work :-)  I've pushed a rebase to here:

https://github.com/berrange/libvirt/tree/storage-src


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list


Re: [libvirt] [PATCH v2 00/15] Misc build refactoring / isolation work

2018-02-01 Thread Peter Krempa
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 16:21:22 +, Daniel Berrange wrote:
> This was triggered by the recent Fedora change to add '-z defs' to RPM
> builds by default which breaks libvirt. Various make rule changes can
> fix much of the problem, but it also requires source refactoring to get
> rid of places where virt drivers directly call into the storage/network
> drivers. Co-incidentally this work will also be useful in allowing us to
> separate out drivers to distinct daemons.
> 
> In v2:
> 
>  - Fixed header file name comment
>  - Resolve conflicts

Could you please upload the rebased version of this to some remote
repository as it has again non-trivial conflicts?

Thanks


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list