Re: [libvirt] Should Libvirt apply for OSS-Fuzz?

2016-12-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 11:08:14AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:16:26AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > > > Google

Re: [libvirt] Should Libvirt apply for OSS-Fuzz?

2016-12-02 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:16:26AM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Google announced OSS-Fuzz project [1]. It's aim is to test projects with > significant user

Re: [libvirt] Should Libvirt apply for OSS-Fuzz?

2016-12-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:14:22AM +0100, Martin Kletzander wrote: > On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > > Google announced OSS-Fuzz project [1]. It's aim is to test projects with > > significant user base and/or critical projects to the global > > infrastructure. I

Re: [libvirt] Should Libvirt apply for OSS-Fuzz?

2016-12-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: > Google announced OSS-Fuzz project [1]. It's aim is to test projects with > significant user base and/or critical projects to the global > infrastructure. I like to think that libvirt falls in both categories :-) > You can find a

Re: [libvirt] Should Libvirt apply for OSS-Fuzz?

2016-12-02 Thread Martin Kletzander
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 08:44:48AM +0100, Michal Privoznik wrote: Google announced OSS-Fuzz project [1]. It's aim is to test projects with significant user base and/or critical projects to the global infrastructure. I like to think that libvirt falls in both categories :-) You can find a list of