Re: [libvirt-users] network-performance

2011-02-02 Thread Francesc Guasch
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:33:28PM -0500, Brian K. White wrote: On 2/1/2011 12:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm just starting to take a look at guest networking performance and am a little disappointed. I'm comparing two setups: Host: Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Host: CentOS 5.5 x86_64

Re: [libvirt-users] network-performance

2011-02-02 Thread Justin Clift
On 02/02/2011, at 7:44 PM, Francesc Guasch wrote: On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:33:28PM -0500, Brian K. White wrote: On 2/1/2011 12:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm just starting to take a look at guest networking performance and am a little disappointed. I'm comparing two setups: Host:

Re: [libvirt-users] network-performance

2011-02-02 Thread Daniel P. Berrange
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 02:33:28PM -0500, Brian K. White wrote: On 2/1/2011 12:39 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: I'm just starting to take a look at guest networking performance and am a little disappointed. I'm comparing two setups: Host: Windows Server 2008 R2 Hyper-V Guest: CentOS 5.5 x86_64

[libvirt-users] virsh : Need help to manage a vm on a remote vmWare

2011-02-02 Thread Etienne GOSSET
Hello, I'm trying to use the tool virsh of libvirt. I want to manage via CLI a vm on a vmware hypervisor which is hosted on a remote host (Is that what you call the node??). I read a lot of thing on your site but I really don't understand how to do something... I saw that: virsh edit

[libvirt-users] iSCSI storage pool questions

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony Goddard
Hi All, I've been trying to figure out the best way of using an iSCSI SAN with KVM and thanks to a helpful post by Tom Georgoulias that I found on this list (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2010-May/msg8.html), it appears I have a solution. What I'm wondering is the

Re: [libvirt-users] iSCSI storage pool questions

2011-02-02 Thread Anthony Goddard
I think I may have inadvertently answered one of my questions, I was under the impression that an iSCSI storage pool was simply a pool of disk that libvirt could then create individual disks on (similar to an LVM VolumeGroup and Logical Volumes). But it seems that all disk creation has to