Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:38:24 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 21:50:19 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi, is there a r
Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the
information returned from virDomainGetJobStats or provided in
VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_JOB_COMPLETED event callback belong to?
I'm specifically interested in distinguishing host-to-host migration
jobs (e.g. those started by
Jiri Denemark <jdene...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 21:50:19 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, is there a reliable way to find out to what kind of job does the
>> information returned from virDomainGetJobStats or provided in
>> VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_J
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, we experienced a strange, non-reproducible error after a successful
>> migration to another host. When we called virDomainDestroyFlags with
Hi, we experienced a strange, non-reproducible error after a successful
migration to another host. When we called virDomainDestroyFlags with
VIR_DOMAIN_DESTROY_GRACEFUL flag after the migration on the source host,
we got VIR_ERR_OPERATION_INVALID (code 55) error. The same with
repeated
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 02:07:11PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" <berra...@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:55:13AM +0100, Milan Zamazal wro
Hi, when working on hot unplugs of various devices, I've found out that
hot unplugging device doesn't generate
VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_DEVICE_REMOVED event. also doesn't have an
alias, so it wouldn't be identifiable in the corresponding callback.
Is this difference from other hotpluggable devices
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:56:39 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Peter Krempa writes:
>>
>
>> > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 19:33:54 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi, when working on hot unplugs of various devices, I've found out th
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 19:33:54 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, when working on hot unplugs of various devices, I've found out that
>> hot unplugging device doesn't generate
>> VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_ID_DEVICE_REMOVED event. also doesn't have an
>
Michal Prívozník writes:
> On 09/19/2018 12:39 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, I'm playing with dynamic ownership and not all objects have their
>> owners changed.
>
>>
>> Is dynamic_ownership and its scope documented somewhere, besides the
>> comment
Michal Privoznik writes:
> On 09/20/2018 12:31 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Michal Prívozník writes:
>>
>
>>> On 09/19/2018 12:39 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>>>> Hi, I'm playing with dynamic ownership and not all objects have their
>>>> owners
Thank you for explanation, it's clear to me now.
One last question: Is there a way to get supported compatibility modes
on POWER? For instance, I get the following from domcapabilities on a
POWER9 machine:
POWER9
IBM
How can I find out that POWER8 guests
Jiri Denemark writes:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 11:52:38 +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from
>> virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine
>
>> while as usable='no' inside a VM running on t
Hi, some custom CPU models are reported from
virConnectGetDomainCapabilities as usable='yes' on a physical machine
while as usable='no' inside a VM running on the same machine. That's
not completely surprising.
But what surprises me is that those models are still reported from
Hi, I'm trying to use virConnectGetDomainCapabilities to get the list of
CPUs compatible with the host CPU. I would like to further limit the
list to CPUs of the same vendor as the host CPU. How can I do that?
I tried to use virConnectBaselineCPU with element and checking
whether I obtain the
Hi, I'm playing with dynamic ownership and not all objects have their
owners changed.
Is dynamic_ownership and its scope documented somewhere, besides the
comment in qemu.conf?
And what kinds of objects are handled by dynamic ownership? While some
objects seem to be handled, other objects are
Hi, I'm trying to add TLS migrations to oVirt, but I've hit a problem
with certificate checking.
oVirt uses the destination host IP address, rather than the host name,
in the migration URI passed to virDomainMigrateToURI3. One reason for
doing that is that a separate migration network may be
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:38:25PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, I'm trying to add TLS migrations to oVirt, but I've hit a problem
>> with certificate checking.
>
>>
>> oVirt uses the destination host IP address, rather than the
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:18:32PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>
>> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:38:25PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi, I'm trying to add TLS migrations to oVirt, but I'
Erik Skultety writes:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 05:38:54PM +0100, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi, when retrieving an mdev device info using `virsh nodedev-dumpxml' or
>> the libvirt API, something like the following is returned:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi, when retrieving an mdev device info using `virsh nodedev-dumpxml' or
the libvirt API, something like the following is returned:
GRID M60-2B4
vfio-pci
4
...
Besides device_api, available_instances and (optional) `name',
`description' of
Milan Zamazal writes:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 12:18:32PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>>
>>
>>> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 03:38:25PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>>> >&
Michal Privoznik writes:
> On 1/21/20 3:28 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> when a normally running VM is migrated, libvirt sends
>> VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_RESUMED_MIGRATED event on the destination once the
>> migration completes. I can see that when a pau
Hi,
when a normally running VM is migrated, libvirt sends
VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_RESUMED_MIGRATED event on the destination once the
migration completes. I can see that when a paused VM is migrated,
libvirt sends VIR_DOMAIN_EVENT_SUSPENDED_PAUSED instead.
Since there seems to be nothing migration
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 04:26:40PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>>
>
>> > On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >
>> &
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> I've met two situations with NVDIMM support in libvirt where I'm not
>> sure all the parties (libvirt & I) do the things correctly.
>>
>&
Hi,
we have a problem in oVirt that highly available VMs don't restart after
host poweroff because Vdsm identifies the case as a user initiated
shutdown (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1800966).
When poweroff is run on the host, libvirt-guests service takes an
action. `virsh shutdown' is run on
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:06:25AM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> "Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
>>
>
>> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >
&g
"Daniel P. Berrange" writes:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 10:35:22PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> we have a problem in oVirt that highly available VMs don't restart after
>> host poweroff because Vdsm identifies the case as a user initiated
Hi,
I've met two situations with NVDIMM support in libvirt where I'm not
sure all the parties (libvirt & I) do the things correctly.
The first problem is with memory alignment and size changes. In
addition to the size changes applied to NVDIMMs by QEMU, libvirt also
makes some NVDIMM size
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> I've met two situations with NVDIMM support in libvirt where I'm not
>> sure all the parties (libvirt & I) do the things correctly.
>>
>&
Milan Zamazal writes:
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 01:21:15PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>>> The second problem is that a VM fails to start with a backing NVDIMM in
>>> devdax mode due to SELinux preventing access to the /dev/dax*
Milan Zamazal writes:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with
> emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's
> possible to make snapshots of running VMs with TPM, but it's important
> to retain the state of swtpm. D
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 14:14:32 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Milan Zamazal writes:
>>
>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with
>> > emulated TPM devices. As far
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 17:54:23 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Peter Krempa writes:
>>
>
>> > On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 14:14:32 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Milan Zamazal writes:
>> >>
>> >
>> >
Hi,
I would like to clarify how to make snapshots of running VMs with
emulated TPM devices. As far as I understand QEMU documentation, it's
possible to make snapshots of running VMs with TPM, but it's important
to retain the state of swtpm. Does libvirt assist with that in any way
or is it
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:54:29 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> I've found out that NVDIMM size and label size matter for regular
>> (non-NV) DIMM hot plug. If the NVDIMM is not aligned correctly, the
>> guest OS wi
Hi,
I've found out that NVDIMM size and label size matter for regular
(non-NV) DIMM hot plug. If the NVDIMM is not aligned correctly, the
guest OS will not accept the hot plugged memory and will complain with
messages such as
Block size [0x800] unaligned hotplug range: start 0x22500,
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 12:54:29PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> I've found out that NVDIMM size and label size matter for regular
>> (non-NV) DIMM hot plug. If the NVDIMM is not aligned correctly, the
>> guest OS wi
Fangge Jin writes:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 2:46 PM Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
>> Fangge Jin writes:
>>
>> > I can share some test results with you:
>> > 1. If no memtune->hard_limit is set when start a vm, the default memlock
>> > hard limit is
Fangge Jin writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 4:08 AM Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
>> > Not sure whether you already know this, but I had a hard time
>> > differentiating the two concepts:
>> > 1. memlock hard limit(shown by prlimit): the hard limit for locked host
Michal Prívozník writes:
> On 8/9/22 12:55, Jin Huang wrote:
>> Hi, everyone
>> I built the libvirt 8.6.0 on my Ubuntu 20 system with the options like this:
>
>> meson build -Dsystem=true -Ddriver_interface=enabled
>> -Ddriver_libvirtd=enabled -Ddriver_network=enabled -Ddriver_qemu=enabled
>>
Peter Krempa writes:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:56:54 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>
>> do I read libvirt sources right that when is not used in the
>> libvirt domain then libvirt takes proper care about setting memory
>> locking limits when ze
Hi,
do I read libvirt sources right that when is not used in the
libvirt domain then libvirt takes proper care about setting memory
locking limits when zero-copy is requested for a migration?
I also wonder whether there are any other situations where memory limits
could be set by libvirt or
od.
Regards,
Milan
> BR,
> Fangge Jin
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 19:25 Milan Zamazal wrote:
>
>> Peter Krempa writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 10:56:54 +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >
>> >
45 matches
Mail list logo