2002_12_27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Perhaps there is some filter on the way that
> kills messages from him on the way to me.
This message may suffer a similar fate, if that is the case.
Fortunately, that won't be a significant loss as this may well be the
last message in the thread...
http:
2002_12_26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> no provision for changing $default_query_sepchar
> except changing the source.
:
> it is probably a good idea
that's what I'd gathered from the feature request thread.
> If it does later become allowed, perhaps it should
> be handled by import() so it norma
2002_12_23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There were lots of mail in my libwww archives that I did
> not find the time to go through this time. Some of
> these probably contains patches that I should have
> applied. If you think I forgot your patch please
> consider resending it.
actual patch:
htt
2002_12_16, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> to be able to round-trip a document that has "&lbar;"
> (or whatever) in it, even tho that's not in the HTML DTD.
The kludge I used does that, although it could be modified to be more
careful and not do it. I only took that approach because it was easier
t
Dave Mitchell wrote:
> strongly suggest you use Perl 5.8.0
Thanks :)
I think I failed to express in my original email that I need for this
work to in perl 5.6. I'm aware that this problem vanishes in later
versions of perl and even quoted that exact section of the docs in a URL
mentioned in
Before I do something kludgey or think too hard trying to find a
solution what others might have already encountered and solved, i
thought I'd drop a quick line here to see anyone here had run into this...
When using HTML::Tree to parse HTML (using perl 5.6, HTML::Tree 3.11)
enocoded HTML enti
request for URI query separator character instance variables:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/#04055
post and discussion of very rough patch to provide same:
http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/#04097
time passes until I get back to the issue tonight :)
I think I've incorporated all of the suggestions:
o
20020920 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The more I look at it the more I think ';' as a separator
> in a URI query is a bad idea that shouldn't be encouraged.
The reason ';' is advocated (and is the default in CGI.pm now) is that
'&' needs to be escaped in HTML. So, if your separator is '&' and you
I've been off on vacation, then sick, but am now catching up on email and I saw this:
2002_09_03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about an option to someway tell query_param to use
> (if not default to) ";" as the separator in query strings
> instead of "&"?
2002_09_03 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: