On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:23:17 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll admit at this point that I've not deeply studied the additions Mark
>> made in the ruby code, so I may well 180 on this 'not including ruby
>> code'
>> in the near future :->
>
> The ruby stuff I am thinking of are ju
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Bamford wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:24:41 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>A while back you posted:
>>
>> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/attachments/20051230/778cd254/libxml-x.obj
>>
>>And I know Mark VanHolst
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:24:41 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A while back you posted:
>
> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/attachments/20051230/778cd254/libxml-x.obj
>
> And I know Mark VanHolstyn posted some pure-ruby stuff with his patches
> also. Will this ruby-add
Hi,
I've just committed the first-cut SAX callback interface. It's not yet
complete (some missing callbacks I think we should support, and only
partial error callback support) but it's in and working with a small
testcase. If anyone wants to try it on something larger that'd be great.
Also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Bamford wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:02:24 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you like the idea of doing callbacks on specific node types? This
>>should be possible with the SAXParser I would assume..but
>>maybe I am wrong?
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:02:24 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you like the idea of doing callbacks on specific node types? This
> should be possible with the SAXParser I would assume..but
> maybe I am wrong?
>
Libxml2's SAX parser doesn't (AFAIK?) support this directly, and my
f
