Re: [libxml-devel] Patches applied

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 15:43:37 +0100, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 4/17/06, Ross Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:35:59 +0100, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> On the other hand, I'm not necessarily adverse to having some kind >> >> of 'easy

Re: [libxml-devel] Patches applied

On 4/17/06, Ross Bamford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:35:59 +0100, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> On the other hand, I'm not necessarily adverse to having some kind > >> of 'easy' API built on top of the core library, if there was enough > >> to it, and i

Re: [libxml-devel] Patches applied

On Mon, 17 Apr 2006 01:35:59 +0100, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On the other hand, I'm not necessarily adverse to having some kind >> of 'easy' API built on top of the core library, if there was enough >> to it, and it was sufficiently 'easy', but then again that's >> probably