Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread TRANS
On 7/22/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi TRANS, > > Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to > work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Yes, but right now I have to work through Red tape. Seems Ross removed himself from teh member

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi TRANS, Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Right - that was libxml not ruby-prof... Charlie smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature __

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
there are still a number of fundamental problems with libxml-ruby - mostly to do with the fact that libxml and ruby are constantly fighting over memory management and the like. Ross - Could you summarize these issues, and exactly what is going wrong where? It would be extremely helpful a

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi TRANS, Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Charlie TRANS wrote: On 7/11/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Trans, If I had time, I'd be happy to, but unfortunately I don't real