On Jul 3, 2:01 pm, Sean Chittenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> git is demon spawn - don't get sucked into the ill-thought-out fad.
I think that's a bit overstated. From what I understand the primary
difference is the backend storage. Git stores an snapshot and Hg
stores a delta. Perhaps Mackal
On Jul 3, 2008, at 14:01, Sean Chittenden wrote:
Before we do that though I was wondering what others thought
about of
switching to Git?
Well, I know git is the new cool think in town. But I'm on
Windows, and
love TortoiseSvn, so I don't have any motivation to move to git
(lousy
window
Eventually, some sort of distributed source code management would be
nice. I think it makes sense for open source projects for a lot of
reasons. That being said, I think it is more important to use a SCM
that is compatible with the environment of the current contributors.
The revival of the gem by
Bugs item #19738, was opened at 2008-04-23 18:01
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=19738&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Nobody (None)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: malloc erro
Bugs item #20117, was opened at 2008-05-13 05:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=20117&group_id=494
Category: memory
Group: v0.5
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gabriel Ebner (gebner)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Bugs item #7622, was opened at 2007-01-05 23:10
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=7622&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Kouhei Sutou (kou)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Summa
Bugs item #16214, was opened at 2007-12-10 08:29
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=16214&group_id=494
Category: memory
Group: v0.5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 4
Submitted By: Dan Janowski (danj)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Bugs item #9135, was opened at 2007-03-08 12:38
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=9135&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Marc Munro (dbdude)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Summ
Eventually, some sort of distributed source code management would be
nice. I think it makes sense for open source projects for a lot of
reasons. That being said, I think it is more important to use a SCM
that is compatible with the environment of the current contributors.
The revival of the gem by
Bugs item #8501, was opened at 2007-02-08 02:31
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=8501&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Charlie Savage (cfis)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Su
Bugs item #7018, was opened at 2006-12-02 14:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=7018&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Nobody (None)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Summary: P
Bugs item #19022, was opened at 2008-03-21 17:03
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=19022&group_id=494
Category: General
Group: v0.5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Paul Legato (plegato)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfi
Bugs item #19258, was opened at 2008-04-02 00:32
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=19258&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Joe Khoobyar (walltndr)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis
Bugs item #20117, was opened at 2008-05-13 05:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=20117&group_id=494
Category: memory
Group: v0.5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Gabriel Ebner (gebner)
Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis
Bugs item #19242, was opened at 2008-04-01 15:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=19242&group_id=494
Category: memory
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Nobody (None)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis)
Summar
Bugs item #17885, was opened at 2008-02-07 20:08
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=17885&group_id=494
Category: General
Group: v0.5
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Saurabh Nanda (saurabhnanda)
>Assigned to: Charlie Sava
Bugs item #19259, was opened at 2008-04-02 00:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=19259&group_id=494
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Joe Khoobyar (walltndr)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savage (cfis
As you might have guessed by the recent email traffic, I've dived
into the libxml (and libxslt) ruby bindings since I need them MapBuzz.
Charlie/MapBuzz FTW! Economic incentive == progress. Glad to hear
you've been able to knock out these bugs. :~]
-sc
--
Sean Chittenden
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Before we do that though I was wondering what others thought about
of
switching to Git?
Well, I know git is the new cool think in town. But I'm on
Windows, and
love TortoiseSvn, so I don't have any motivation to move to git
(lousy
windows support and no gui). I suppose it was easy to hav
On Jul 3, 1:15 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Trans,
>
> > Sorry I've been out of the loop for a bit. I've been working on some
> > other projects.
>
> > I just emailed Charlie about working with him to get a new release
> > out. How do we want to handle this? Should we tag th
Hi Trans,
Sorry I've been out of the loop for a bit. I've been working on some
other projects.
I just emailed Charlie about working with him to get a new release
out. How do we want to handle this? Should we tag the current version
and allow the patches on trunk? Or create a branch and apply th
Hi all,
Sorry I've been out of the loop for a bit. I've been working on some
other projects.
I just emailed Charlie about working with him to get a new release
out. How do we want to handle this? Should we tag the current version
and allow the patches on trunk? Or create a branch and apply the
pa
22 matches
Mail list logo
