1.2/lib/libxml/node.rb:100: [BUG]
> Bus Error
> ruby 1.8.6 (2008-03-03) [universal-darwin9.0]
>
> Abort trap
This works fine for me. What version of libxml2 are you running? Use
this command to find out:
ruby -rubygems -e'require "libxml"; puts LibXML::XML::
! My answer is "it depends". :-(
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
ush(output);
+ VALUE string = Qnil;
+
if (output->conv)
-return rb_str_new2((const char*) output->conv->content);
+string = rb_str_new2((const char*) output->conv->content);
else
-return rb_str_new2((const char*) output->buffer->conten
solution. I'm not sure what bits of our
code overlaps. I think our underlying C bits are too different. I'm all for
sharing, but I like the project I have set up now.
> Note sure if #2 or #3 are viable, but I'd be happy to give it some more
> thought. I'm also happy
th you).
Great! Nokogiri has an MIT license, so go for it. :-)
> So we're happy to work together on our end.
We are too. Feel free to steal our code, or submit patches:
http://github.com/tenderlove/nokogiri/tree/master
We'd be happy to have you help. :-)
Rig
On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 11:56:50AM -0700, Trans wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 30, 1:15 pm, Aaron Patterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > nokogiri version 1.0.0 has been released!
>
> Very impressive project, Aaron!
>
> I've been building much the same thing
doc.search('h3.r a.l', '//h3/[EMAIL PROTECTED]"l"]').each do |link|
puts link.content
end
Changes:
### 1.0.0 / 2008-07-13
* 1 major enhancement
* Birthday!
* <http://nokogiri.rubyforge.org/>
* <http://github.com/tenderlove/n
I guess its a little late to find this, but the expat ruby wrapper is
using the XML namespace. Just FYI! :-)
http://rubyforge.org/projects/xmlparser/
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel
are: 1) each ruby class in its own file,
and 2) each class under a directory corresponding to its module/class.
For example, the class LibXML::Node::Set would live as
"lib/libxml/node/set.rb". The LibXML::Node class would live as
"lib/libxml/node.rb", and 'require'
y would print to, but that's just a nicety (e.g.
> XML::Parser.register_error_handler($stdout)). -sc
Ask and you shall receive Sean,
I've submitted a patch that moves register_error_handler from C to
Ruby, and lets you pass an IO object where error message may be
written.
http://rubyforge.org
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jul 11, 3:21 pm, "Aaron Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Separate scripts are more intuitive than rake tasks?
>
> I understand what you thinking, but there are some c
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Trans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jul 11, 1:45 pm, "Aaron Patterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> I've added a patch to the tracker that adds a test task and a build
>> task to the rake file.
>
reference to the lambda *on the class*
(well, actually as a static VALUE). So if the error_handler was set
somewhere else, it won't necessarily be nil (which is what that
failing test asserts).
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
ox. Is this trunk or before
> the libxml.rb patch? -sc
setup.rb has never successfully run the tests for me, even before the
libxml.rb patch. I'm on OS X.
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
r that adds a test task and a build
task to the rake file.
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=21172&group_id=494&atid=1973
If you apply that patch, you can just execute 'rake build' to build
the extension, and 'rake test' to run the tests.
Als
ect_file'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:73:in
`recursive_collect'
from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Ruby.framework/Versions/1.8/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/test/unit/collector/dir.rb:58
t; Said differently, let sleeping dogs lie and don't waste effort unless effort
> needs to be expended to fix something... patches welcome. *grin*
>
> How's that? -sc
Perfect. I will submit patches. It does not seem like wasted effort
to me because I w
ENSE file for copyright and distribution information
-require 'libxml_ruby'
+require 'libxml/libxml_ruby'
module XML::XMLParserOptions
XML_PARSE_RECOVER = 1 # recover on errors
@@ -131,4 +131,4 @@
def to_s
"#{name} = #{value}"
end
-end
\ No newline at end of file
+
e
in ruby, then you could write a c function to return the integer of
xnode->type, then write all of your *? methods in ruby.
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
.
By the way, I added a patch to the tracker to do some cleanups in the tests.
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&aid=21162&group_id=494&atid=1973
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
Hi!
As I've started reading through the libxml-ruby code, I have run
across methods implemented in C that could be implemented in Ruby. I
would like to change them to be implemented in Ruby. Is anyone
opposed to that? I think it would make coding easier, less buggy, and
more fun!
--
2008/7/10 Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Aaron Patterson wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm trying to compile and run the tests from trunk. As far as I can
>> tell, you just run setup.rb. Is that correct? The tests don't seem
>>
ich
doesn't exist on OS X. Is the require on the so file intentional?
Thanks!
--
Aaron Patterson
http://tenderlovemaking.com/
___
libxml-devel mailing list
libxml-devel@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo
