-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TRANS wrote:
> On 7/18/06, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I don't think they have vanished. It's been a little over a week since Ross
>>has sent an email to this ML. Perhaps he is on
>>vacation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TRANS wrote:
> On 7/17/06, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>I'm switching to Ruby from Perl, and currently I do all my HTML parsing in
>>perl's XML::LibXML. Applying XPath to parse HTML is extremely powerful and
>>fast, fast, fast in libxml.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yann Klis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick message to let you know that I'm very pleased with the Ruby
> bindings for libxml2. The performance are far greater than with REXML
> for example.
> The API is not always very "nice", but I think you will make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
zdennis wrote:
> zdennis wrote:
>
>>David posted this message on ruby-talk ML.
>>
>>---
>>Is there a Ruby XML parser that includes the file name
zdennis wrote:
> David posted this message on ruby-talk ML.
>
> ---
> Is there a Ruby XML parser that includes the file name and line number
&g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David posted this message on ruby-talk ML.
- ---
Is there a Ruby XML parser that includes the file name and line number
for elements?
- ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Bamford wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 13:24:41 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>A while back you posted:
>>
>> http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/libxml-devel/attachments/20051230/778cd254/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Bamford wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:02:24 +0100, zdennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Do you like the idea of doing callbacks on specific node types? This
>>should be possible with the SAXParser I would ass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you like the idea of doing callbacks on specific node types? This should be
possible with the SAXParser I would assume..but
maybe I am wrong?
Zach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbir
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross Bamford wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've today committed changesets including Mark Van Holstyn's patches, an
> additional patch I received from Tim Yamin, and a few small fixups and
> extra tests. These fix bugs in XML::Node#content, and add several
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ross / Sean,
Is there a preferred way (for future reference) on how you'd like to receive
api suggestions or patches? Inline in email, patches
in code, pdfs, openoffice documents, etc..
Thanks,
Zach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4
Ross Bamford wrote:
>
>
> From my point of view, I'm behind with docs as it is and have plenty to do
> on the code, so it's probably not the right time to do that. Once we get
> the next round of releases out the way, and things are calmer, it would
> probably be a great idea :).
>
> [1]:
Mark Van Holstyn wrote:
> Here is my suggestions for the API. Let me know what you think.
>
I think Mark's document makes alot of sense. I am using Marks changes currently
(patched 0.3.6) and
I love the method 'first' that he has added to XML::Node.
I fully agree that removing Node::Set in favo
13 matches
Mail list logo
