Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-25 Thread Charlie Savage
My biggest problem is the documentation for libxml2 seems to rather suck in relation to the complexity of the interface. So I have not been able to get my head around the options for solving this problem. My past (long ago) uses of SWiG for other purposes left much to be desired, so I have

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-25 Thread Dan Janowski
I have been on vacation. My contributions to date have been minor, but I am have a vested interest in getting the memory model problem resolved. I did something similar for the Berkeley DB library, which had a completely faulty binding approach and rewrote it entirely and now is completely

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-23 Thread Ross Bamford
On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 22:06:32 +0100, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> there are still a number >> of fundamental problems with libxml-ruby - mostly to do with the fact >> that >> libxml and ruby are constantly fighting over memory management and the >> like. > > Ross - Could you sum

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
there are still a number of fundamental problems with libxml-ruby - mostly to do with the fact that libxml and ruby are constantly fighting over memory management and the like. Ross - Could you summarize these issues, and exactly what is going wrong where? It would be extremely helpful a

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-21 Thread Ross Bamford
Hi Folks, On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 18:03:21 +0100, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any > more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to > Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members listed: > >

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-18 Thread Laurent Sansonetti
On Jul 18, 2007, at 2:53 PM, TRANS wrote: > On 7/12/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any >> more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to >> Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-18 Thread Keith Fahlgren
On 7/18/07 8:53 AM, TRANS wrote: > On 7/12/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any >> more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to >> Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members listed: >> >

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-18 Thread Daniel N
On 7/18/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/12/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any > more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to > Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members li

Re: [libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-18 Thread TRANS
On 7/12/07, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any > more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to > Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members listed: > > Dan Janowski > Laurent Sansonetti >

[libxml-devel] Maintainer

2007-07-12 Thread TRANS
I see that Ross Bramford is not even listed as a project member any more --let alone the maintainer. So that means things fall back to Sean Chittenden -- but is he around? I see three other members listed: Dan Janowski Laurent Sansonetti Pat Eyler Are any of you guys around? I fear there's