Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-23 Thread Ross Bamford
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:18:17 +0100, TRANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/22/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi TRANS, >> >> Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to >> work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. > > Yes, but right

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread TRANS
On 7/22/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi TRANS, > > Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to > work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Yes, but right now I have to work through Red tape. Seems Ross removed himself from teh member

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi TRANS, Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Right - that was libxml not ruby-prof... Charlie smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature __

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-22 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi TRANS, Were you still planning on doing this? If so, I'll patch ruby-prof to work better on Windows. And I can package up a windows gem. Charlie TRANS wrote: On 7/11/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Trans, If I had time, I'd be happy to, but unfortunately I don't real

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-11 Thread Charlie Savage
Cool. What's your rubyforge id? cfis - http://rubyforge.org/users/cfis/ Charlie smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ libxml-devel mailing list libxml-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/libxml-devel

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-11 Thread TRANS
On 7/11/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Trans, > > If I had time, I'd be happy to, but unfortunately I don't really. > > But if you add me on as a committer, I'll be happy to make the > free/xfree changes. Cool. What's your rubyforge id? T. _

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-11 Thread Charlie Savage
And I'll happy to make it build on Windows - I've mastered that skill with ruby-prof :) Charlie TRANS wrote: On 7/9/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: P.S. - Any progress on integrating the leak patches from OpenStreetMap? Hi-- I haven't heard a peep from Ross in a long time.

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-11 Thread Charlie Savage
Hi Trans, If I had time, I'd be happy to, but unfortunately I don't really. But if you add me on as a committer, I'll be happy to make the free/xfree changes. And I'm happy to apply patches if people can provide test cases showing what's broken and that their patch fixes it. It seems like t

Re: [libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-11 Thread TRANS
On 7/9/07, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > P.S. - Any progress on integrating the leak patches from OpenStreetMap? Hi-- I haven't heard a peep from Ross in a long time. As the project's, sort of, "guardian angel" I think its time for a new maintainer*. Any takers? T. *I'm not a C

[libxml-devel] Use xfree not free

2007-07-09 Thread Charlie Savage
A couple of weeks ago Johnathan Conley and I spent some time trying to get libxml to work better on windows. Unfortunately, we did not succeed due to the memory leaks mentioned in other threads. However, one obvious error in the current bindings is the use of free. The bindings use Ruby's ALL