I just set out to do some simple measurements to see how fast libxml may
be compared to hpricot.
I made a little script with a ~4 megs XML document appended after __END__.
$ uname -s
CYGWIN_NT-5.1
$ gem list libxml
*** LOCAL GEMS ***
libxml-ruby (0.5.2.0)
LibXML2 bindings for Ruby
$ head -1
http://libxml.rubyforge.org/ points to
http://libxml.rubyforge.org/rdoc/ but that gives a 404
google has several pages as http://libxml.rubyforge.org/doc/ but that
is gone now too.
Are there alternate sites that have the documentation or a good examples?
__
On Nov 7, 2007 1:49 PM, mortee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just set out to do some simple measurements to see how fast libxml may
> be compared to hpricot.
>
> I made a little script with a ~4 megs XML document appended after __END__.
>
> $ uname -s
> CYGWIN_NT-5.1
> $ gem list libxml
>
> *** LO
On Nov 7, 2007 1:23 PM, Tony Primerano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://libxml.rubyforge.org/ points to
> http://libxml.rubyforge.org/rdoc/ but that gives a 404
I will generate some, but I can;t promise you they will be very
helpful. We really need to a documentation wiki.
T.
_
The timing info is curious because libxml does the job with very
little cpu time, it is the real-time delay that is the problem.
On identifying the location of the delay (since it is wall-clock time
we are talking about), it should be sufficient to do splits between
each method call (could j
The timing info is curious because libxml does the job with very
little cpu time, it is the real-time delay that is the problem.
On identifying the location of the delay (since it is wall-clock time
we are talking about), it should be sufficient to do splits between
each method call (coul
