Hi,
Sorry I have been off the radar, some personal crap has been keeping me
occupied.
The memory model changes have been largely effective and creates a good
one to one coupling between ruby object and libxml entities. The issue
that sean is talking about is no longer the case. I have removed
Ref
On Mar 7, 5:47 am, Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry I have been off the radar, some personal crap has been keeping me
> occupied.
>
> The memory model changes have been largely effective and creates a good
> one to one coupling between ruby object and libxml entities. The issue
> th
My experience is that -core is not very helpful and it may well sound
like any number of other complaints they have received. I have my
doubts there is anything they can really offer.
Dan
> Hey Dan, what do you think of forwarding this to ruby-core mailing
> list? I'm suspect the best input
> I have contemplated abandoning support, but I would rather not. Being
> the only coder makes it harder as ultimately every bug is my problem.
> But that is not the issue, ruby 1.8 is. I have considered moving to
> rubinius to see if their compatibilty api is better than the original.
> But that m
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 13:27 -0800, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > I have contemplated abandoning support, but I would rather not. Being
> > the only coder makes it harder as ultimately every bug is my problem.
> > But that is not the issue, ruby 1.8 is. I have considered moving to
> > rubinius to see
