I have been unable to continue work, my personal life not allowing. However,
the amount of effort that I have put into this has not cleared the library
of all its problems and it really needs active shared involvement of more
than just a single developer. This is sort of asking for manna, but the
n
I shifted out of libxml to the (much) slower REXML and an ad-hoc
over-the-network Java based XSD validation system. I would love to get
libxml-ruby working again. A lot of my projects will depend on it.
Dan, how can other people help? Is there someone who can coordinate
other people's efforts in t
REXML is a mess, and not just because it's slower. Currently, the consensus
seems to be to use
Hpricot's XML mode until libxml stabilizes.
~~ Robert.
Saurabh Nanda wrote:
> I shifted out of libxml to the (much) slower REXML and an ad-hoc
> over-the-network Java based XSD validation system. I wo
I shifted out of libxml to the (much) slower REXML and an ad-hoc
over-the-network Java based XSD validation system. I would love to get
libxml-ruby working again. A lot of my projects will depend on it.
Dan, how can other people help? Is there someone who can coordinate
other people's efforts in
The intersection is a null set. The best hope may be rubinius where the
extensions can be written in ruby. Fixing the memory model for nodes and
documents made a big difference, but the problems that are lingering are
elusive and compounded by ruby's obsficating GC. I put a lot of time into
it, but
