You're right - using pkg-config, not xml2-config, is the BCP. Any
Unix system with a libxml from the last few years should have this.
David
On Dec 13, 2008, at 5:46 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
2008/12/13 Todd Fisher :
I think it's best to check for both... something like this would
be ide
You're right - using pkg-config, not xml2-config, is the BCP. Any
Unix system with a libxml from the last few years should have this.
I hate to be the stick in the mud, but pkg-config is a fantastic PITA
that's as joyous to work with as most of the autofuck utils. FreeBSD,
Solaris, and ma
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
>> You're right - using pkg-config, not xml2-config, is the BCP. Any Unix
>> system with a libxml from the last few years should have this.
>
> I hate to be the stick in the mud, but pkg-config is a fantastic PITA that's
> as joyous to work
