It would be fun to write a grammar for all the licenses that could be
produced this way, though. Then you could write a very concise definition
of
a particular license.
This has been lightly discussed on the web communities Slashdot and
Segfault:
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 18:32:32 +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
I've been wondering about the interactions between GPL clause 3
(requirement to distribute source with modified redistributions) and
non-free OSs.
gnu.misc.discuss is often viewed as the definitive forum for discussion the
GPL; you
2 matches
Mail list logo
