RE: What license to pick...

2000-10-02 Thread Lionello Lunesu
OK, I'll 'share' my thoughts on all of these mails. : ) Thanks for all the helpful input by the way! I appreciate it! LL So we (my company) have decided to make our VR-toolkit open source! LL [...] LL AND we don't want other people to be able to create their LL own distribution of the toolkit.

RE: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)

2000-10-02 Thread Dave J Woolley
From: SamBC [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Really??? What was wrong with it - I did it all by hand, so I thought it wouldn't have any weirdness [DJW:] No DOCTYPE and blockquote immediately subordinate to ul, see

Re: What license to pick...

2000-10-02 Thread John Cowan
Lionello Lunesu wrote: So what am I doing here on opersource.org? I want to go "open source". I've put it between quotes since it turns out to be something different than what I thought. I want to share the source code with others. They may use the source code for learning, debugging,

RE: What license to pick...

2000-10-02 Thread David Johnson
On Mon, 02 Oct 2000, Lionello Lunesu wrote: OK, if this is the case, then I'll have to change the plans. I don't want togo open-source.. I think though that the license I'm looking for is out there, somewhere. But it looks like I'll be writing my own license agreement. Let me describe our

Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)

2000-10-02 Thread Rick Moen
begin nights quotation: Consider:You want people to be able to copy freely (can do that in copyright notification easily, yeah). You want people to be able to modify, comment, and re-use the work, while it remaining *completely* clear which parts are the original work (without having to

Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)

2000-10-02 Thread nights
- Original Message - From: "Dave J Woolley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] [DJW:] No DOCTYPE and blockquote immediately subordinate to ul, see I didn't realise that was required - I was under the (obviously mistaken) impression that w3c HTML included defaults for all that 4.01 for HTML,