Re: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution

2002-08-15 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Russell Nelson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): They were also wrong. Oh, we *can* stretch the definition, but inventing requirements out of whole cloth is an invitation to a party -- party to a lawsuit, that is. I understand (thanks to Lawrence) the reason why this could create problems

RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution

2002-08-15 Thread Brian Behlendorf
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Russell Nelson wrote: I like mine (well duh!) because it explicitly says that all is fair in love, war, and software use and modification except for a few things. That's also its weakness because the list needs to be right; no more and no less. Actually, it's alright if

RE: Legal soundness comes to open source distribution

2002-08-15 Thread Russell Nelson
Brian Behlendorf writes: On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Russell Nelson wrote: I like mine (well duh!) because it explicitly says that all is fair in love, war, and software use and modification except for a few things. That's also its weakness because the list needs to be right; no more and