On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Chuck Swiger ch...@codefab.com wrote:
Nope. The obligation to keep the copyright statement intact is typically
required by law (see 17 USC section 506(c)(d) or your local equivalent), and
the obligation to keep the license terms disclaimer intact is a standard
Hi everyone,
does a linking exception to the GPL require approval, or may a software be
called open source whenever it is licensed under the GPL, even when the
publisher grants the user additional rights?
There are some licenses around that add a linking exception to the GPL. The one
I use is
On 07/05/2012 06:30 PM, Chris Travers wrote:
Generally RMS seems to think this is not permissible, and most other
people outside the FSF don't listen.
It is not permissible to modify the GPL text directly. That restriction
has teeth. However, I can't think of a legal mechanism that could be
3 matches
Mail list logo