Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Bruce Perens
There are two different fundamental forms of copyright regime. One is based upon the right to copy, and the other is based upon the moral rights of authors. A number of European nations, for example, are moral rights regimes, while the U.S. is based upon the right to copy. However, even in the

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Johnny Solbu
On Monday 16 July 2012 16:30, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > Ah, is it to avoid a situation where an author might be pressured into > waiving that right? That is one of the reasons, yes. There is quite a few statues throuth our law that prohibit waiver's in certain situations. :-)= -- Johnny A. Solbu

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > The reasoning behind it is to give credit to the authors. To ensure that > happens, the law make it as a statutory requirement. The author cannot waive > this right. Ah, is it to avoid a situation where an author might be pressured into wa

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Chris Travers
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > On Monday 16 July 2012 15:43, Casey Rodarmor wrote: >> > (As an example, we are legaly required to give credit to King James as the >> > author when we redistribute the old 1611 KJV Bible.) >> >> This kind of blew my mind. What are the benefi

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Johnny Solbu
On Monday 16 July 2012 15:43, Casey Rodarmor wrote: > > (As an example, we are legaly required to give credit to King James as the > > author when we redistribute the old 1611 KJV Bible.) > > This kind of blew my mind. What are the benefits--supposed or > otherwise--of such a law? The reasoning

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Johnny Solbu wrote: > Unless you explicitly transfer the copyright to someone else, You are the > copyrights holder. Don't confuse copyrights with licensing. That's a very good point. I think I confuse licensing with transferring copyright sometimes. > (As an ex

Re: [License-discuss] OSI approved license without original license and reproduction of notices required in redistributions?

2012-07-16 Thread Casey Rodarmor
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Rick Moen wrote: > Perhaps you should use Apache License v. 2.0 with an accomanying > statement that you as copyright owner waive all conditions cited in > section 4. Something like: > > Copyright 2012 by Casey Rodarmor . > > Licensed under the Apache License,