Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

I've talked with the lawyer in the ARL legal office. He says he is in contact with people up and down the chain of command, so that should be taken care of. Thanks, Cem Karan > -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0

I've passed your question along, I'll answer as soon as I know. Thanks, Cem Karan > -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H. > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2016 5:16 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org >

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: US Army Research Laboratory Open Source License proposal

I'm sorry for getting back late to this, the lawyer I'm working with was called away for a bit and couldn't reply. I asked specifically about this case; in our lawyer's opinion, the US Government does have copyright in foreign (to the US) countries. He says that there is case law where the US