[cross-post to license-review, snipped.]
Quoting Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) (cem.f.karan@mail.mil):
> What about GitHub?
Using a proprietary hosting platform for outsourced tracking of open-source
licenses? Could work, but that risks punishment by the Gods of Irony.
BTW,
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 5:02 PM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S.
> Army
What about GitHub? There have been suggestions on the Python-ideas list to do
this for any new python ideas. The idea is simple; each license becomes its
own project. Issues can then be tracked via the issue tracker, making it easy
to segregate the issues into individual threads, and as
OK, so it's the way I thought. First, propose a license on this list for
discussion, but the actual review takes place on the license-review mailing
list.
Thanks,
Cem Karan
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of
4 matches
Mail list logo
