ARL's policy (see
https://github.com/USArmyResearchLab/ARL-Open-Source-Guidance-and-Instructions#433214A2C17C11E6952E003EE1B763F8)
cover this. External contributions would be covered by the OSI-approved
license, so the patent/IP terms in that license will cover those patent
rights.
Thanks,
As a part of ARL's internal release process, the Lab waives all patent/IP
rights (except for the ARL trademarks). That only leaves the external
contributions, which would be done under one of the OSI-approved licenses.
Thanks,
Cem Karan
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss
Would CC0 plus Apache licenses resolve the patent problem?
/Larry
-Original Message-
From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On Behalf
Of Smith, McCoy
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 9:37 AM
To: license-discuss@opensource.org
Subject: Re:
FWIW, I have authored what I call a "plug-in" license intended to allow an
add-in patent license to licenses like CC0 that lack one (or disclaim them).
It's a bit of a WIP, and isn't OSI approved (nor would it likely ever be as
it's not an independent license). I presented it to the CC folks
On 28/02/17 17:09, Smith, McCoy wrote:
> You should consider the fact that CC0 has an express disclaimer of
> patent licenses (in Section 4.a). That may mean that it doesn't
> address one of the concerns that I think you had (i.e., that there
> might be USG patents covering the non-US
You should consider the fact that CC0 has an express disclaimer of patent
licenses (in Section 4.a). That may mean that it doesn't address one of the
concerns that I think you had (i.e., that there might be USG patents covering
the non-US copyrightable USG work distributed by the USG).
The CC
6 matches
Mail list logo
