Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject)

2017-09-07 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
> -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H. > Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2017 12:10 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject) > > Cem, > >

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: (no subject)

2017-09-07 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
Cem, I think I’ve mentioned this in the past but GOSS needs not be bazaar style open development. Cathedral development that simply open sources the resulting product still has tremendous value to the community. From that perspective CLAs, and dealing with external contributions are a