See below. I should have made some extra things clear.
David Johnson wrote:
On Thursday 31 October 2002 07:42 am, Brendan Hide wrote:
You have the right to do *anything* with a copyrighted work only if you
have agreed and complied with (and read) the license.
I didn't mean that wi
gle-click click-wrap solution working
very well.
--
Brendan Hide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Writer
SA Computer Magazine
http://www.sacm.co.za/
+27 21 715 7134
-
Opinions expressed in this Email are those of the individual
logy, I guess it assumes that the children
signed some sort of a "user agreement". If the user agreement read like the
GPL, then I guess you wouldn't care what they did to the playground. But on
the other hand, if the user agreement read like the GPL, you couldn't stop
them eit
front yard and tell the neighbourhood that
their children can all use it - whose is it? If I also say that the
parents can make additions to it to make it safer or more "exciting" -
who is the owner after they've made these changes?
--
Brendan Hide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical
to the above license, you may
And then, you should not call it the GPL.
Regards,
Mahesh T Pai.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
--
Brendan Hide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Writer
+27 83 448 3867
SA Computer Magazine
http://www.sacm.co
tributor (collectively with the Original Contributor, the
>"Contributors") hereby grant you...
>
--
Brendan Hide
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technical Writer
+27 83 448 3867
SA Computer Magazine
http://www.sacm.co.za/
+27 21 715 7134
--
that it isn't OSS-specific (not actually my
intention ubt useful nevertheless). I suppose that an agreement (that
the same contract must be provided to and accepted by any subsequent
licensees) should also be included but I'm not the right person to put
that paragraph together.
My 2c.
--
B
7 matches
Mail list logo
