Sorry to keep alive an OT thread, but the last post contains
a historical inaccuracy which I don't want to let stand
unchallenged.
On 2003.03.03 05:02 Sergey Goldgaber wrote:
Computer scientists and engineers should not make the
mistake of the pre-atomic bomb physicists in believing
that their
), is
there any way for me to find out whether the license was sent back for
reconsideration, rejected outright, or not even considered?
Michael St. Hippolyte
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
, as well as
the standard library of Bento code, a completely independent
implementation would probably have a hard time worming its way into
use in place of standard implementations.
Michael St. Hippolyte
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
.
Thank you!
Michael St. Hippolyte
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.bentodev.org
...
The Bento Poetic License
Preamble
The intent of this document is to state the conditions under which a
Package may be copied, such that the Copyright Holder maintains control
4 matches
Mail list logo