and
Open Source Licenses
I will respond inline this time because the conversation got
complicated.
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Reincke, Karsten
k.rein...@telekom.de wrote:
Many thanks for your detailed description. Indeed, I am sorry that
we are reciprocally frustrated
. And
their license did as much to achieve that goal as they thought they
could under US law.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Reincke, Karsten
k.rein...@telekom.de wrote:
Dear Mr. Tilly;
On a first glance, your mail seems to be clear an reasonable.
Unfortunately you are impeding the everyday work
law countries, until a legal precedent is set, there is no way
to tell whether the courts will interpret the license in the way that
the drafters hope they will.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Reincke, Karsten
k.rein...@telekom.de wrote:
Dear Colleagues;
In the past I
First of all:
Many, many, thanks to Luis for initiating such OSI approved compliance pages!
For companies and their managers it is very important to quickly get reliable
answers which do not evoke fundamental costs. They get worry about
complexitity and costs. Ever. So with respect to the
://opensource.telekom.net/kreincke/kr-dtag-sign-de.txt ]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Sullivan [mailto:jo...@fsf.org]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Januar 2014 00:24
An: Reincke, Karsten
Cc: license-discuss@opensource.org
Betreff: Re: [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack
Question: Is it really necessary to add the MIT license to jquery for using
this javascript library compliantly?
Background:
Javascript is a script language. Such libraries are embedded into our html
pages (normally) for enabling the browsers of our customers to modify our html
pages directly
I am very sorry, but where can I create such an account? [Yes I know, the
problem sits often in front of the keyboard. But does this knowledge solve the
problem ;-) - so again, sorry for that silly question.]
Best regards
Karsten Reincke
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
As you perhaps know, the (Telekom) Open Source Compliance Advisor [
http://opensource.telekom.net/oscad/ ] is listed in the OSI List of Licensing
Tools [ http://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Projects/List+of+Licensing+Tools ].
The service idea of OSCAd is simple: Answer 5 questions. Select an open
Dear Lius;
We have just created a new worldwide accessible instance of the OSCAd which now
is running on a server which is intended to live for a very long time much
longer - than the instance running on my private server.
So, I think it would be fine to update the link in your list to that
Dear colleagues;
Recently, github has offered an open source license chooser for the project
owners. It aims of simplifying the selection of an appropriate license. This
tool was well appreciated -- not only by this OSI mailing list.
As a large company in Germany, we also acclaim the existence
[...]
You can see the PHP source code, so it's Open Source, right?
That could be misleading, since the PHP source code could mean
https://github.com/php/php-src.
How about:
FooProgram is written in PHP, and I have the source code. Does that
mean it's definitely open source?
Dear Open Source (License) Community,
As recently indicated, Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG) has now published the
initial, very early version of an Open Source License Compendium. It is
a) licensed under the 'Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Germany'
Dear OSI Experts,
Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG) is writing an Open Source License Compendium, which
we intend to be made available to the whole Open Source community.
Large (IT) companies are particularily challenged by the quantity of licenses
and their various versions. It is becoming quite
)cense
(C)ompendium
[I think Karsten reposted this because there was a moderation delay on
the original message, to which I have already responded on-list. Please
use that original thread if possible.]
-K
Reincke, Karsten k.rein...@telekom.de writes:
Deutsche Telekom AG (DTAG) is writing an Open
14 matches
Mail list logo
