Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)

2017-09-01 Thread Ben Hilburn
Hi all - I figured I would throw in my thoughts for this discussion. IANAL and all of the usual disclaimers. My expertise, as it pertains to this thread, is really in the building & sustainment of F/OSS communities and projects, albeit outside of the government space. On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at

Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)

2017-09-01 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
@opensource.org> Date: Friday, September 1, 2017 at 9:47 AM To: License Discuss <license-discuss@opensource.org> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] (no subject) Cem, Yes, only in the case of fully public domain do our approaches differ. Our view was that a project that never had a contribution f

Re: [License-discuss] (no subject)

2017-09-01 Thread Tom Bereknyei
Cem, Yes, only in the case of fully public domain do our approaches differ. Our view was that a project that never had a contribution from a non-federal entity would likely not reach a critical mass of adoption anyway. This isn't perfect, but the best we could come up with. I'm glad though that