Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

017 2:51 PM > > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update > > > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:03 AM Christopher Sean Morrison <brl...@mac.com > < Caution-mailto:brl...@mac.com > > wrote: > > &g

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

> -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Luis Villa > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 2:51 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update >

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 7:03 AM Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > > > On Mar 8, 2017, at 9:32 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) < > cem.f.karan@mail.mil> wrote: > > > > You might want to re-read what they posted; the license applies only to > those > > portions of

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

> -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Christopher Sean Morrison > Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2017 10:03 AM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Sourc

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 9:32 AM, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) > wrote: > > You might want to re-read what they posted; the license applies only to those > portions of the code that have copyright attached, otherwise it's public > domain. The trick is that

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] code.mil update

You might want to re-read what they posted; the license applies only to those portions of the code that have copyright attached, otherwise it's public domain. The trick is that while US Government (USG) works are ineligible for copyright within the US, they may be eligible for copyright