Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-08 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
ce.org] On > Behalf Of Lawrence Rosen > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 4:57 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Cc: Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com> > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD > > All active links contained in this e

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
they do a FOSS release. From: Christopher Sean Morrison <brl...@mac.com<mailto:brl...@mac.com>> Date: Tuesday, Mar 07, 2017, 5:57 PM To: license-discuss@opensource.org <license-discuss@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss@opensource.org>> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-D

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Tzeng, Nigel H.
From: Christopher Sean Morrison <brl...@mac.com<mailto:brl...@mac.com>> Date: Tuesday, Mar 07, 2017, 5:57 PM To: license-discuss@opensource.org <license-discuss@opensource.org<mailto:license-discuss@opensource.org>> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] p

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Mar 07, 2017, at 04:09 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:55:37PM +, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: Of particular significance, it calls into question whether there are any OSI-approved licenses that specifically exclude patent rights

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Lawrence Rosen
Europe? /Larry -Original Message- From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On Behalf Of Richard Fontana Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 1:09 PM To: license-discuss@opensource.org Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD On Tue,

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Richard Fontana
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 03:55:37PM +, Christopher Sean Morrison wrote: > Of particular significance, it calls into question whether there are > any OSI-approved licenses that specifically exclude patent rights in > the current portfolio or whether CC0 would be the first of its > kind.  If

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
> -Original Message- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Christopher Sean Morrison > Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 10:56 AM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Christopher Sean Morrison
On Mar 07, 2017, at 09:07 AM, "Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)" wrote:I personally think that software that is distributed without a patent license or a waiver of patent claims is not Open Source (this is my opinion, and not a Government position).It certainly

Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] patent rights and the OSD

2017-03-07 Thread Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [License-discuss] patent rights and the OSD > > All active links contained in this email were disabled. Please verify the > identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links > contained within the message prior to copying and pas