Of Tzeng, Nigel H.
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 5:00 PM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: [Non-DoD Source] Re:
> [Non-DoD Source] Re: U.S. Army Research Laboratory Open
> Source License (ARL OSL) 0.4.0
>
&
Why not limit it to USG lawyers? That may be an easier sell for a first
meeting. Especially if you can convince someone at the OMB to host the
telcon because of the new policy and get the relevant DOJ lawyers to dial
in.
It is too much to expect clear guidance (this is the government after all)
Larry, I agree with you completely about the need for all attorneys talking to
one another, while us engineers sit back and listen. I'm going to try to talk
the various attorneys in the USG that I've contacted into being part of a
telecon. If I'm able to do so, are there any attorneys on this
> -Original Message-
> From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On
> Behalf Of Lawrence Rosen
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2016 2:35 PM
> To: license-discuss@opensource.org
> Cc: Lawrence Rosen
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Re:
4 matches
Mail list logo