>> Hi all, as you know I've been pushing the position that the US Government
>> may
>> have problems using copyright-based licenses on works that do not have
>> copyright attached. One of the lawyers I've been working on this with has
>
> How is their position if the works are in the Public
On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 02:18:10PM +, Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL
(US) wrote:
> Hi all, as you know I've been pushing the position that the US Government may
> have problems using copyright-based licenses on works that do not have
> copyright attached. One of the lawyers I've been
Karan, Cem F CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US) dixit:
>Hi all, as you know I've been pushing the position that the US Government may
>have problems using copyright-based licenses on works that do not have
>copyright attached. One of the lawyers I've been working on this with has
How is their
Hi all, as you know I've been pushing the position that the US Government may
have problems using copyright-based licenses on works that do not have
copyright attached. One of the lawyers I've been working on this with has
been kind enough to dig up the exact statutes and give some clearer
ping
And to Richard Fontana... **PING**
Thanks,
Cem Karan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
What is the current progress on the NOSA 2.0 license? I just got out of a
meeting with some NASA lawyers, and they want to know where it's going, and if
it's stuck, why it's stuck.
Thanks,
Cem Karan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
6 matches
Mail list logo
