Quoting Al Foxone (akvariu...@gmail.com):
My understanding is that the GPL applies to object code aside from
source-access obligations.
[Reminder: There _are_ other copyleft licences. In RHEL, even.]
Show me an object-code RPM in RHEL for which Red Hat, Inc. do not
provide the open source /
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 4:30 AM, Rick Moen r...@linuxmafia.com wrote:
Quoting Al Foxone (akvariu...@gmail.com):
Red Hat customers receive RHEL compilation as a whole in ready for use
binary form but Red Hat claims that it can not be redistributed in
that original form due to trademarks
Quoting Al Foxone (akvariu...@gmail.com):
Red Hat customers receive RHEL compilation as a whole in ready for use
binary form but Red Hat claims that it can not be redistributed in
that original form due to trademarks (without additional trademark
license, says Red Hat) and under
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote:
Al Foxone asked me on Friday at 13:58 (EDT) about:
http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/corp/RH-3573_284204_TM_Gd.pdf
...
At the same time, the combined body of work that constitutes Red Hat®
Enterprise Linux® is a collective work
Al Foxone asked me on Friday at 13:58 (EDT) about:
http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/corp/RH-3573_284204_TM_Gd.pdf
...
At the same time, the combined body of work that constitutes Red Hat®
Enterprise Linux® is a collective work which has been organized by Red
Hat, and Red Hat holds the copyright in
Bradley M. Kuhn scripsit:
It's certainly possible to license all sorts of copyrights under GPL,
since it's a copyright license. Red Hat has chosen, IMO rather oddly,
to claim strongly a compilation copyright on putting together RHEL and
Red Hat licenses that copyright under terms of GPL.
I
6 matches
Mail list logo
