Larry Masters writes:
May have to put this back on the drawing board. Basically what we are
wanting to do with the license is control code created to work with
the licensed software, control meaning that any software created to work
with it must be released under the same license and
Just wanted to bring this up again. Did not have any comments on it
before. Also would like some input from others if you think this covers
derivatives, or other projects based on the licensed projects code.
Hi
I would like to submit the Open Project Public License (OPPL) for OSI
compliance.
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Larry Masters wrote:
1. You are granted the non-exclusive rights set forth in this license
provided you agree to and comply with any and all conditions in this
license. Whole or partial distribution of the Software, items that link
with the Software, items that link with
Alex,
Do you think section 5 covers this?
5. You may use the original or modified versions of the Software to
link, run, or interact in anyway with application programs or components
legally developed by you or by others.
Larry E. Masters
Alex Rousskov wrote:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Larry Masters
Alex,
Under section 5 the user would be able to use the editor if the editor
was legally created or obtained. At least this is what I would think.
May have to put this back on the drawing board. Basically what we are
wanting to do with the license is control code created to work with
the
Larry Masters scripsit:
May have to put this back on the drawing board. Basically what we are
wanting to do with the license is control code created to work with
the licensed software, control meaning that any software created to work
with it must be released under the same license and
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Larry Masters wrote:
Under section 5 the user would be able to use the editor if the
editor was legally created or obtained. At least this is what I
would think.
Agreed. My concern is not about the user of the editor, but about the
author of the editor. It seems odd to
John,
I do not agree that the GPL would work for this.
I have seen problems in other projects where someone creates an program
to work with another program but the source code is not released because
it is argued that the new program is not derived from the other, which
with my understanding
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Larry Masters wrote:
I have seen problems in other projects where someone creates an
program to work with another program but the source code is not
released because it is argued that the new program is not derived
from the other, which with my understanding of the GPL
Larry Masters scripsit:
I have seen problems in other projects where someone creates an program
to work with another program but the source code is not released because
it is argued that the new program is not derived from the other, which
with my understanding of the GPL and US copyright
John and Alex,
How does this sound?
Original QPL version:
1. You are granted the non-exclusive rights set forth in this license
provided you agree to and comply with any and all conditions in this
license. Whole or partial distribution of the Software, or software
items that link with the
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Larry Masters wrote:
Whole or partial distribution of the Software, *items that link
with the Software, items that link with a component of the Software,
or* items that interact with any portion of the Software to form an
extended version of the Software signifies
12 matches
Mail list logo
