without restriction?
/Larry
-Original Message-
From: Rod Dixon [mailto:Rod Dixon]
Sent: Friday, April 09, 2004 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: License for a document or presentation?
I have often wondered whether
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. said on Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:22:51PM -0400,:
Whether the principles supporting licensing documents differed from
software,
Appears to depend on what you want to achieve. If you want
e-propagation of the document, a copyleft license will be better, IMO.
: Lawrence E. Rosen
Date: 4/9/04 12:07 am
To: 'Steve Thomas', 'License Discussion Open Source'
Subj: RE: License for a document or presentation?
The Open Software License (OSL) and the Academic Free License (AFL) work
perfectly well for documentation. I usually use the AFL for my documents
Is there an existing OS license that would fit licensing a slide
presentation to Open source? I have a slide show I use for making
presentations on Open Source around the country, and it occurs to me it
should be Open Source! But I don't know how to license it, since it's
not a code.
On Apr 8, 2004, at 10:52 AM, Steve Thomas wrote:
Is there an existing OS license that would fit licensing a slide
presentation to Open source? I have a slide show I use for making
presentations on Open Source around the country, and it occurs to me
it should be Open Source! But I don't know
Or you could use one of the many licenses at Creative Commons:
http://creativecommons.org/license/
-Alex
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004 14:13:15 -0700, Ernest Prabhakar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 8, 2004, at 10:52 AM, Steve Thomas wrote:
Is there an existing OS license that would fit licensing a
, not that it matters as far as
the license is concerned. :-)
/Larry Rosen
-Original Message-
From: Steve Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 10:52 AM
To: License Discussion Open Source
Subject: License for a document or presentation?
Is there an existing OS license
7 matches
Mail list logo
