Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-07 Thread Russell Nelson
Bruce Dodson writes: You misunderstood me, Larry. I was not saying that YOU were trying to discourage RSW from pursuing approval. On the contrary I was surmising, without putting words in your mouth, that you'd agree that this would be unconscionable. As for Russ and others, I

Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-07 Thread Lewis Collard
Russell Nelson sez: In any case, I'm very suspicious of this term: - Use of any form whatsoever must retain the three automatically generated META tags for all HTML output; these tags indicate that the page was generated by eNetwizard and directs users to more information

Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-06 Thread Bruce Dodson
I don't know if this is quite what Larry was saying, but I for one consider it an unfair tactic to try to discourage RSW from seeking approval. Russ and other board members may think he is misguided in believing that others will want to use his license, and might even be right, but that does not

RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-06 Thread Robert Samuel White
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) I don't know if this is quite what Larry was saying, but I for one consider it an unfair tactic to try to discourage RSW from seeking approval. Russ and other board members may think he is misguided

RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-06 Thread Lawrence E. Rosen
I don't know if this is quite what Larry was saying, but I for one consider it an unfair tactic to try to discourage RSW from seeking approval. Russ and other board members may think he is misguided in believing that others will want to use his license, and might even be right, but that

Re: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-06 Thread Bruce Dodson
' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Robert Samuel White' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Russell Nelson' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:00 PM Subject: RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) I don't know if this is quite what Larry was saying

RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-06 Thread Robert Samuel White
] To: 'Bruce Dodson' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Robert Samuel White' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Russell Nelson' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 9:00 PM Subject: RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise)) I don't know if this is quite what Larry

RE: Moral Rights (was Simplified Artistic License (A Proposed Compromise))

2002-10-03 Thread Lawrence E. Rosen
Robert Samuel White and Russ Nelson: I'm sorry I haven't stepped into this conversation sooner. I've been lurking and handling other matters I am unhappy with the current status of this request. Robert Samuel White (RSW) is absolutely within his rights to obtain approval for his license