From: SamBC [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Really??? What was wrong with it - I did it all by hand, so I thought it
wouldn't have any weirdness
[DJW:] No DOCTYPE and blockquote immediately subordinate to ul, see
begin nights quotation:
Consider:You want people to be able to copy freely (can do that in
copyright notification easily, yeah). You want people to be able to modify,
comment, and re-use the work, while it remaining *completely* clear which
parts are the original work (without having to
- Original Message -
From: "Dave J Woolley" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[DJW:] No DOCTYPE and blockquote immediately subordinate to ul, see
I didn't realise that was required - I was under the (obviously mistaken)
impression that w3c HTML included defaults for all that
4.01 for HTML,
From: SamBC [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
http://www.simplelinux.org/legal/sLODL.html
Opinions on OS-ness and legality, and general good/badness, pls
[DJW:] The HTML is invalid, although it makes an
exceptionally good attempt to use elements for their
intended purpose
To: "SamBC" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, SamBC wrote:
Okay, this license is in the queue to be dealt with by the OSI board,
but I
would like to start using
l document so
can't be that simple)
SamBC
- Original Message -
From: "David Johnson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "SamBC" [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: simpleLinux Open Documentation License (sLODL)
On
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, SamBC wrote:
Okay, this license is in the queue to be dealt with by the OSI board, but I
would like to start using it meantime without certification, and would
appreciate opinions...
It's way too long and complicated to deserve the name "simple". Far
from it! There are
7 matches
Mail list logo
