-
From: David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Rod Dixon' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:08 PM
Subject: Re: Model Code for the OSD
: On Saturday 18 January 2003 09:39 am, Lawrence E. Rosen
IMHO, I think we all know well-documented source
code when we see it.
Excuse me, but is the OSD being written for the
esteemed and talented frequent posters to this
list or as a guideline for a wider audience ?
Cheers. dj
--
license-discuss archive is at
David Johnson scripsit:
My opinion is that deliberately obfuscated source code should be decoupled
from documentation. The quality and state of documentation is very
subjective, and should not be a part of the OSD.
IMHO that was meant to exclude people from publishing their source code
My opinion is that deliberately obfuscated source code should be
decoupled
from documentation. The quality and state of documentation is very
subjective, and should not be a part of the OSD.
IMHO that was meant to exclude people from publishing their
source code after it had been
David Johnson wrote:
My opinion is that deliberately obfuscated source code should be decoupled
from documentation. The quality and state of documentation is very
subjective, and should not be a part of the OSD.
I have to agree with David. The documentation quality of the source
code is
by the end of the month unless others post views to the contrary.
Rod
- Original Message -
From: David Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rod Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: Model Code for the OSD
: On Friday 17 January 2003
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 8:41 AM
To: David Johnson; Rod Dixon
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Model Code for the OSD
David has proposed that Article 2 of the OSD not be read to
require documented source code. To implement this change on
our draft, I can delete from
On Saturday 18 January 2003 09:39 am, Lawrence E. Rosen wrote:
I would prefer requiring all available documentation describing how to
modify the original work. That means that a developer cannot hide
documentation that IS available simply to make others' work more
difficult. /Larry
I'm not
On Friday 17 January 2003 09:57 am, Rod Dixon wrote:
Larry List members: at your convenience, please download the current
draft of the OSD's proposed model code.
I have one nit.
4: Source code that is exceptionally difficult to read either because it is
not documented or is cryptically
9 matches
Mail list logo